Now and then, p.5

Now & Then, page 5

 

Now & Then
Select Voice:
Brian (uk)
Emma (uk)  
Amy (uk)
Eric (us)
Ivy (us)
Joey (us)
Salli (us)  
Justin (us)
Jennifer (us)  
Kimberly (us)  
Kendra (us)
Russell (au)
Nicole (au)



Larger Font   Reset Font Size   Smaller Font  

  Come sweet death! be persuaded O beautiful death!

  In mercy come quickly.

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 25

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  26 Robert Hass / 1998

  He also visited Congress and listened to the proceedings: “Much gab,

  great fear of public opinion, plenty of low business talent, but no master-

  ful man.”

  According to his biographer Justin Kaplan, he began to look for work

  when his money ran out, his health nearly broken by the long hours in

  the hospital. But Washington, you will be surprised to learn, was full of

  literary critics and keepers of the public morality. A friend went to the

  secretary of the Treasury, Salmon Chase, to ask about getting Whitman a

  clerk’s position at the Treasury. He brought with him a letter from Ralph

  Waldo Emerson recommending Whitman as one of America’s great writ-

  ers. Chase turned down Whitman’s application because he had written

  a “very bad book” and was “a decidedly disreputable person.” However,

  Secretary Chase, who collected autographs, kept Emerson’s letter of rec-

  ommendation: “I have nothing of Emerson’s in his handwriting, and I

  shall be glad to keep this.”

  Eventually Whitman got a position as a clerk at the Department of the

  Interior in the Office of Indian Affairs. He had hardly settled in when a

  new secretary, Senator James Harlan of Iowa, took over the department.

  Harlan was a militant Methodist. Also, according to Mark Twain, a “great

  Injun pacificator and land dealer.” He fired Whitman immediately: “I will

  not have the author of that book in this department.” And while he was

  at it, he fired everyone “whose conduct does not come within the rules

  of decorum and propriety prescribed by a Christian Civilization,” includ-

  ing all the women in the department, since he regarded their presence as

  “injurious to . . . the morals of the men.”

  “The meanest feature of it all,” the old poet remembered years later in

  Camden, “was not his dismissal of me, but his rooting around in my desk

  in the dead of night looking for evidence against me.”

  fe bruary 15

  Stanley Plumly

  Here’s a poem of Washington, D.C., on a winter day. It’s by Stanley Plumly,

  from his book The Marriage in the Trees (Ecco Press):

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 26

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  1998 / Now & Then 27

  Farragut North

  In the tunnel-light at the top of the station two or three

  figures huddled under tarps built against the wind crossing

  Connecticut at K. It’ll be noon before they rise in their

  Navajo blankets, trinkets, ski masks and gloves to start the

  day, noon before the oil slicks of ice on the sidewalks thaw.—

  In the forties, after the war, in the land of Uz, when

  somebody came to the house for a handout, my mother’d give

  him milk money or bread money as well as bread and milk.

  To her each day was the thirties. The men at the door had the

  hard-boiled faces of veterans, soldiers of the enemy. My

  mother saw something in them, homelessness the condition

  of some happiness, as if in the faces of these drifters could be

  read pieces of parts of herself still missing: like the Indian

  woman in Whitman’s Sleepers who comes to his mother’s door

  looking for work where there is no work yet is set by the fire

  and fed: so that for my mother, the first time she left, it

  became a question of whom to identify with most, the

  wanderer or the welcomer.—The stunted sycamores on K are

  terminal, though they’ll outlast the hairline fractures marbling

  the gravestones of the buildings. Under the perfect pavement

  of the sky the figures frozen in this landscape contemplate the

  verities too fundamentally for city or country: their isolation

  is complete, like the dead or gods. When I think of a day with

  nothing in it, a string of such days, I think of the gray life of

  buildings, of walking out of my life in a direction just

  invented, or, since some of us survive within mental wards

  of our own third worlds, I see myself disguised for constant

  winter, withdrawn into the inability to act on the least impulse

  save anger and hear myself in street-talk talking street-time.

  —Such is the freedom of transformation, letting the deep

  voice climb on its own: such is the shell of the body broken,

  falling away like money’s new clothes; such is my mother’s

  truant spirit, moving dead leaves with the wind among

  shadows . . .

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 27

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  28 Robert Hass / 1998

  I can tell you what interests me about this poem technically. Poets in

  the sixteenth century used to describe a poem that shoulders out past

  the usual base of ten syllables as written in a “strong line.” This poem

  seems to have a base of fourteen syllables; it gets longer than that, but no

  shorter, except in the second to last line. And it does what poems based

  on syllable count often do: it mostly ignores the line-end, sweeps right

  past it, ends the line raggedly on articles and prepositions. And this usu-

  ally doesn’t work very well with a long-lined poem; it tends to make the

  line itself as a musical measure disintegrate so that you get a feeling that

  you’re reading chopped-up prose, unless the forward momentum of the

  sentences and the thought gathers you with it. Which, I think, in this

  poem they do.

  Everyone projects their own dramas onto street people and probably

  projects different dramas at different times. I like the way this poem’s

  long breath, impatient, impelled forward, doesn’t have breathless urgency,

  which is the effect you’d most likely get from this technique. Instead it

  feels like the long breaths of hard walking in the cold. Plumly grew up in

  rural Ohio and Virginia and teaches now at the University of Maryland.

  He’s long been admired as a poet and critic, and in both his poetry and

  criticism he’s been interested in John Keats, has written a poetry that

  seemed American and Southern but could be gorgeous in the way of

  Keats. So there is something surprising for people who know his work in

  the toughness and force of this poem.

  What moves and interests me about it though is what any reader would

  probably get from it whether they knew his work or took an interest in

  technique. The way the city’s homeless in the winter set him to think-

  ing about old American archetypes, his mother’s kitchen-door kindness

  to strangers, tough strangers, as a habit of the Depression years, and the

  memory of the beautiful passage in Whitman about the Indian woman at

  his mother’s door in rural nineteenth-century Long Island, these make-

  shift and homemade charities of another age. And then the reversal comes:

  that his mother was one of these wanderers. And then the question for

  all of us about whom we identify with in the sentimental (but practical

  enough) tableaus of charity. And then the end of the poem, which seems

  to me curiously adult and bitter with an uncomfortable mix of wistful-

  ness and emptiness in it. And there’s another darkness here, I suppose. This

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 28

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  1998 / Now & Then 29

  is, after all, the capitol city, the symbolic repository of an idea of freedom.

  Wanderer, welcomer, body broken, truant spirit, all of us with our private

  wounds and longings for transformation.

  fe bruary 22

  Sonia Sanchez

  One of the nominees this year for the National Book Critics Circle

  Award in poetry is Sonia Sanchez’s Does Your House Have Lions? (Beacon

  Press). It’s a book-length narrative poem about a Southern black family

  come to New York in the 1960s. The speakers are a young brother who

  has plunged into the gay subculture of the city and into the civil rights

  movement and who ultimately dies of AIDS; a Southern father afraid for

  his children and guilty at his neglect of them; a sister who must come

  to terms with her anger and grief; ancestral voices that speak the story

  against the background of African American life. It’s written in a series of

  intricately rhymed seven-line stanzas, each one a small song.

  Here’s the sister speaking of her seventeen-year-old brother, who is on

  the scene in Manhattan:

  and the bars. the glitter. the light

  discharging pain from his bygone anguish

  of young black boy scared of the night.

  sequestered on this new bank, he surveyed the fish

  sweet cargoes crowded with scales feverish

  with quick sales full sails of flesh

  searing the coastline of his acquiesce.

  Here is the brother drawn out of the life of the bars by a new voice in

  the streets:

  came the summer of nineteen sixty

  harlem luxuriating in Malcolm’s voice

  became Big Red beautiful became a city

  of magnificent Black Birds steel eyes moist

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 29

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  30 Robert Hass / 1998

  as he insinuated his words of sweet choice

  while politicians complained about this racist

  this alchemist. this strategist. this purist.

  Here is the father who has not been there for his son:

  i was a southern Negro man playing music

  married to a high yellow woman who loved my unheard

  face, who slept with me in nordic

  beauty. i prisoner since my birth to fear

  i unfashioned buried in an open grave

  of mornings unclapped with constant sight

  of masters fattened decked with my diminished light.

  Here are the ancestral voices that end the poem:

  have you prepared a place of honor for me?

  have you recalled us from death?

  where is the mmenson to state our history?

  where are the griots the food my failed breath?

  where is the morning path i crossed in good faith?

  what terror slows your journey to this dawn?

  have you prepared a place for us to mourn?

  In a note Sanchez explains that a mmenson is an “orchestra of seven

  elephant tusk horns used on state occasions to relate history.” This is a

  metaphor for her seven-line stanza, seven horn flourishes to tell the story

  and preserve the memory.

  march 1

  Marie Howe

  Marie Howe’s new book, her second book of poems, is called What the

  Living Do (Norton). Many of the poems deal with a beloved brother’s

  death from AIDS, but the book begins with poems of childhood and

  adolescence. The boys’ fort that the girls couldn’t go into. The initiation

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 30

  3/20/07 2:26:58 PM

  * * *

  1998 / Now & Then 31

  where boys tie up girls, and things start to get out of hand, and the one

  boy the girls might trust is afraid to say, “Stop it.” The pajama parties

  where girls talk about boys and practice kissing. They’re delicious poems,

  and they have the effect of making you understand how powerful the love

  between a brother and sister can be, and what it might mean to have your

  older brother and protector die before your eyes.

  Howe’s way with language is very spare. Many of the poems have a

  stripped-down, point-blank quality that gives them a certain radiance.

  Here’s one:

  The Last Time

  The last time we had dinner together in a restaurant

  with white tablecloths, he leaned forward

  and took my two hands in his hands and said,

  I’m going to die soon. I want you to know that.

  And I said, I think I do know.

  And he said, What surprises me is that you don’t.

  And I said, I do. And he said, What?

  And I said, Know that you’re going to die.

  And he said, No, I mean know that you are.

  Here’s another:

  The Promise

  In the dream I had when he came back not sick

  but whole, and wearing his winter coat,

  he looked at me as though he couldn’t speak, as if

  there were a law against it, a membrane he couldn’t break.

  His silence was what he could not

  not do, like our breathing in this world, like our living,

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 31

  3/20/07 2:26:59 PM

  * * *

  32 Robert Hass / 1998

  as we do, in time.

  And I told him: I’m reading all this Buddhist stuff,

  and listen, we don’t die when we die. Death is an event,

  a threshold we pass through. We go on and on

  and into light forever.

  And he looked down, and then back up at me. It was the look

  we’d pass

  across the table when Dad was drunk again and dangerous,

  the level look that wants to tell you something,

  in a crowded room, something important, and can’t.

  march 8

  John Koethe

  I’ve been reading an extraordinarily interesting book of poems, Falling

  Water (HarperPerennial) by John Koethe. It interests me so much because

  one of his subjects is the kind of psychic withdrawal from public life that

  many people who came of age in the 1960s underwent.

  I hadn’t really thought about that time for a while or my own experi-

  ence of it. Think about the young Americans who grew up having the

  protected childhoods of the 1950s, threw themselves ardently into the

  civil rights movement and the peace movement, found their heroes in

  public figures like John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King

  and Malcolm X, and saw them assassinated one by one, gunshots that

  rang through the decade. And there was more: the shots fired at Kent

  State by National Guardsmen in the wake of yet another escalation of the

  war, the inconclusive and belated American withdrawal from Vietnam, the

  investigation of burglaries sanctioned by a sitting president. These same

  young people found themselves a few years later in the middle of adult

  life in Ronald Reagan’s America when the public style was conspicuous

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 32

  3/20/07 2:26:59 PM

  * * *

  1998 / Now & Then 33

  indulgence, the gap between rich and poor was growing, and the media

  heroes were millionaires like Donald Trump.

  What happened to many of them was a retreat into private life, a kind

  of internal exile they only half-recognized themselves, and it’s a story that

  hasn’t been registered in our literature very well. Koethe’s book is about

  disappointment in many forms. But I think one of the things he’s trying

  to do is find a way to speak about this generational experience from the

  point of view of a writer. The language of the poems is calm, analytical,

  even abstract, and there is a dry anguish in it, an undertow of complex

  and baffled emotion. The quality of the language may have to do with

  the fact that he is a philosopher by profession. He’s written a book about

  Ludwig Wittgenstein.

  It doesn’t make for easy poems, but reading him I felt the “shock of

  recognition” that lets you know you’re in the presence of real writing. See

  what you think:

  Morning in America

  It gradually became a different country

  After the reversal, dominated by a distant,

  Universal voice whose favorite word was never,

  Changing its air of quiet progress into one of

  Rapidly collapsing possibilities, and making me,

  Even here at home, a stranger. I felt its tones

  Engaging me without expression, leaving me alone

  And waiting in the vacuum of its public half-life,

  Quietly confessing my emotions, taking in its cold

  Midwinter atmosphere of violence and muted rage. I

  Wanted to appropriate that anger, to convey it, not

  In a declamatory mode, but in some vague and private

  Language holding out, against the clear, inexorable

  Disintegration of a nation, the claims of a renewed

  Internal life, in these bleak months of the new year.

  That was my way of ruling out everything discordant,

  Everything dead, cruel, and soulless—by assiduously

  Imagining the pages of some legendary volume marked

  Forever, but without ever getting any closer. As I

  Now&Then_Interior_REV5.indd 33

  3/20/07 2:26:59 PM

  * * *

  34 Robert Hass / 1998

  Got older it began to seem more and more hopeless,

  More and more detached—until it only spoke to me

 

Add Fast Bookmark
Load Fast Bookmark
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Scroll Up
Turn Navi On
Scroll
Turn Navi On
183