Untangling complex syste.., p.74

Untangling Complex Systems, page 74

 

Untangling Complex Systems
Select Voice:
Brian (uk)
Emma (uk)  
Amy (uk)
Eric (us)
Ivy (us)
Joey (us)
Salli (us)  
Justin (us)
Jennifer (us)  
Kimberly (us)  
Kendra (us)
Russell (au)
Nicole (au)



Larger Font   Reset Font Size   Smaller Font  

  −

  3.64886 3 6183

  .

  By applying the formula of the error propagation, we find that the uncertainty in δ is 0.2.

  Therefore,

  δ = 4 4

  . ± 0 2

  . in reasonable agreement with the theoretical result of 4.669…

  Note that it is not an easy task that of determining the appearance of a bifurcation in the

  presence of experimental noise. Usually, it is not possible to measure more than about five

  period-doublings (Cvitanovic 1989). Nevertheless, the agreement between experiments

  and theory is remarkable.

  The Emergence of Chaos in Time

  367

  s

  c) r in (; i

  0.948

  nd 1

  .7 a

  0.947

  een 0

  etw

  0.946

  luded bnc

  )

  s i

  0.945

  b) r i

  th rate

  n (; i

  0.944

  r (Grow

  nd 1

  een 0 a

  0.943

  etw

  s b

  alue

  0.942

  es v

  ssum

  0.941

  0.945

  0.94

  0.935

  a), r a

  opulation)

  values (P

  x

  inal

  F

  n (

  (c)

  . I

  π

  1

  1

  () nxrsi

  0.9

  =

  +1 nn

  0.8

  0.95

  x

  ap

  0.7

  0.9

  )

  )

  odal m

  0.6

  nim

  th rate

  0.5

  th rate

  0.85

  he uf t

  0.4 r (Grow

  r (Grow

  0.8

  0.3

  iagram o

  .948.

  0.2

  0.75

  nd 0

  0.1

  ifurcation d

  .941 a

  0

  B

  1

  0

  1

  0 0.7

  0.9

  0.8

  0.7

  0.6

  0.5

  0.4

  0.3

  0.2

  0.1

  0.9

  0.8

  0.7

  0.6

  0.5

  0.4

  0.3

  0.2

  0.1

  een 0

  opulation)

  values (P

  x

  nal

  Fi

  )

  opulation)

  values (P

  x

  nal

  Fi

  (a)

  (b

  0.30

  etw

  E 1

  UR

  luded b

  FIG

  inc

  368

  Untangling Complex Systems

  Pattern formation

  by convection

  FIGURE 10.31 An example of Bénard convection with a silicone oil plus aluminum powder.

  10.10. The Bénard cells are examples of what Ilya Prigogine called as dissipative structures.

  A system maintained very far-from-equilibrium self-organizes, producing entropy that is

  dissipated in the environment. When the Marangoni number ( Ma) is Mac < Ma ≤ 2 Mac,

  the cells show a hexagonal shape (Lappa 2010). The circulation of the fluid in the hexago-

  nal cells is upwards in the center and downwards along the edge. Optical investigations

  have demonstrated that the surface of the fluid is depressed over the center of the cells of

  a few micrometers. For Ma values larger than 2 Ma , the cells become squared. The tran-

  c

  sition from hexagons to squares is mediated by the occurrence of pentagonal cells. The

  squared cells are more efficient in heat transfer than hexagonal cells, and their formation

  is accompanied by an increase in the Nusselt number (see equation [10.23]). The patterns

  that you observe also depend on the boundary conditions, i.e., the material of the plate

  and its shape. An example of Bénard convection is shown in Figure 10.31 obtained with a

  silicone oil having 100 mPa*s as viscosity at room temperature.

  10.11. For the numerical solution of the system of nonlinear differential equations [10.36

  through 10.38], you can use the ode45 solver of MATLAB. An example of script is the

  following one:

  function dy = lorenz(t, y)

  dy = zeros(3,1);

  si = 10;

  r = 28;

  b = 8/3;

  dy(1) = si*(y(2) - y(1));

  dy(2) = -y(1)*y(3) + r*y(1) - y(2);

  dy(3) = y(1)*y(2) - b*y(3);

  The time evolutions of variable X for the two pairs of initial conditions are shown in

  Figure 10.32. The data graphed in plot (a) refer to the first two initial conditions:

  [ X (0); Y (0); Z(0)] = [1 .

  3

  ;

  824

  .

  15

  ;

  368

  .

  32 474] and [ X (0) ;′ Y (0) ;′ Z(0) ]′ = [13.

  ;

  824 15.

  ;

  369

  .

  32 474]. The data graphed in plot (b) refer to the other pair of initial conditions that are

  close to S 0. It is evident that when the initial conditions are closer to S 0, the two trajectories

  take more time to diverge.

  By using the data of plot (a), we can calculate how the Euclidean distance δ between

  the two initially very close trajectories increases over time. The output is depicted in

  Figure 10.33. We confirm what we see in Figure 10.17. The ln( δ ) first grows linearly, until it saturates. The slope of the straight line fitting the growth part (see the gray straight

  line in Figure 10.33) is λ ~ .

  0 9.

  The Emergence of Chaos in Time

  369

  20

  10

  X( t)

  0

  −10

  (a)

  0

  4

  8

  12

  16

  20

  24

  28

  t

  20

  10

  0

  X( t)

  −10

  −20

  0

  4

  8

  12

  16

  20

  24

  28

  (b)

  t

  FIGURE 10.32 Trends of X( t) for two pairs of initial conditions: for the pair close to S+ in (a), and for the pair close to S 0 in (b).

  4

  2

  0

  δ||) −2

  In (||

  −4

  −6

  −8 0

  5

  10

  15

  20

  t

  FIGURE 10.33 Trend of ln( δ ) versus time (thin black trace). The first part of this trend has been fitted by a straight line (thick gray trace).

  370

  Untangling Complex Systems

  In. Con.: [14.0 12.0 10.0]

  In. Con.: [14.0 12.1 10.0]

  10

  X( t)

  0

  −10

  0

  4

  8

  12

  16

  20

  10

  0

  Y( t) −10

  −20

  0

  4

  8

  12

  16

  30

  20

  Z( t)

  10

  0

  0

  4

  8

  12

  16

  Time

  FIGURE 10.34 Trends of X( t) (on top), Y( t) (in the middle), and Z( t) (at the bottom) for the two initial conditions indicated into the legend.

  10.12. The solutions of the calculations obtained for the two distinct initial conditions proposed

  in the text of the exercise are shown in the Figures 10.34 and 10.35.

  In the first stages, both trajectories seem to describe a strange attractor. But, in the

  long term, we discover that both of them spiral down toward one of the two stable solu-

  tions, which are S+ and S−. What is surprising is that although the dynamic is not cha-

  otic because it is not aperiodic in the long term, it shows sensitive dependence to the

  initial conditions. In fact, although we start the calculations from two points that are

  only δ =

  0

  0.1 far apart in the phase space, the system evolves towards two very distant

  solutions: S+ and S−. Therefore, the behavior of the system is unpredictable, at least for

  certain initial conditions, and it is referred to as transient chaos or metastable chaos or

  pre-turbulence (Strogatz 1994). In the cases of transient chaos, the final states are simple:

  they are periodic or stationary states. Nevertheless, the presence of a transient chaotic

  stage can make the entire process hard to be predicted in its outcome. This situation is

  familiar in everyday life. It suffices to think about gambling like throwing a dice or a coin.

  The outcome depends sensitively on the initial orientation and velocity if the latter is suf-

  ficiently large. A system exhibits transient chaos when a non-attracting chaotic saddle is

  present in its phase space. The system stays near the chaotic saddle for a finite amount of

  time exhibiting chaotic behavior, before exiting that region and approaching its final state

  asymptotically.

  10.13. In paragraph 10.7, we learned that when r > rc we can observe chaotic dynamics. In this exercise, we calculate the evolution of the Lorenz’s system for a considerable value of

  The Emergence of Chaos in Time

  371

  35

  In. Con.: [14.0 12.0 10.0]

  In. Con.: [14.0 12.1 10.0]

  30

  25

  20

  Z( t) 15

  10

  5

  Starting points

  0

  −15

  −10

  −5

  0

  5

  10

  15

  X( t)

  FIGURE 10.35 Trajectories traced in the Z( t)– X( t) space, starting from the two initial conditions indicated into the legend.

  parameter r ( r = 350). Surprisingly, we find that the dynamic is periodic. The period of the

  oscillations does not depend on the initial conditions we choose (Figures 10.36 and 10.37).

  Usually, when r > rc, one finds chaotic dynamics but there are also small windows

  of periodic behavior interspersed (Strogatz 1994). This phenomenology resembles that

  observed in the case of the logistic map presented in paragraph 10.3.

  10.14. First, I report the results achieved by following the instructions of list A. In Figure 10.38, the absorption spectra of DMA, before (trace 0), and after irradiation (traces 1 and 2) are

  120

  80

  40

  X( t)

  0

  −40

  −80

  0

  2

  4

  6

  8

  10

  200

  0

  Y( t) −200

  0

  2

  4

  6

  8

  10

  600

  400

  Z( t) 200

  0

  0

  2

  4

  6

  8

  10

  Time

  FIGURE 10.36 Periodic trends of X( t) (on top), Y( t) (in the middle), and Z( t) (at the bottom) obtained for σ =10, b = 8 / 3, r = 350, and [ X(0), Y(0), Z(0)] = [0, 1.00, 0] as initial condition.

  372

  Untangling Complex Systems

  300

  200

  100

  Y( t)

  0

  −100

  −200

  −300

  −60

  −30

  0

  30

  60

  90

  X( t)

  FIGURE 10.37 Trajectory traced in the Y( t)– X( t) space when σ = 10, b = 8 / 3, r = 350, and [ X(0), Y(0), Z(0)] = [0, 1.00, 0] is the initial condition.

  2.0

  1.5

  IEM

  2

  A 1.0

  400

  450

  500

  1

  0.5

  λ (nm)

  0

  0.0 350

  300

  350

  400

  450

  500

  λ (nm)

  FIGURE 10.38 Absorption spectra of DMA before (continuous black trace, labeled as 0) and after two dis-

  tinct irradiations (dotted light gray and dashed gray traces, labeled as 1 and 2, respectively). The fluorescence

  spectrum of DMA is shown in the inset.

  reported. The spectra 1 and 2 have been recorded after two distinct irradiation experi-

  ments. They are significantly different from spectrum 0. This evidence suggests that UV

  irradiation at 260 nm triggers reactions that decompose DMA. In fact, it is known that

  when anthracene derivatives, substituted in positions 9 and/or 10, are excited in their

  higher energy optically active transition (i.e., below 300 nm), they participate in photo-

  dissociation reactions. In other words, they release their substituents as radical groups

  (Favaro et al. 2007). Moreover, the radiation at 260 nm is absorbed not only by DMA

  but also the solvent CHCl . Upon irradiation at 260 nm, chloroform produces chlorine

  3

  radicals. Then, chlorine radicals induce chain reactions involving oxygen and promoting

  a more or less noticeable oxidative degradation of DMA (Laplante and Pottier 1982).

  The Emergence of Chaos in Time

  373

  (1) λexc = 260 nm, λem = 408 nm, h = 3.5 cm

  (2) λexc = 260 nm, λem = 408 nm, h = 3.5 cm

  (3) λexc = 260 nm, λem = 408 nm, h = 1.2 cm

  1

  .u.)

  .u.)

  (a

  2

  (a

  I em

  I em

  1

  3

  0

  500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

  850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150

  (a)

  t (sec)

  (b)

  t (sec)

  2

  3

  .u.)

  .u.)

  (a

  (a

  I em

  I em

  400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900

  260

  280

  300

  320

  340

  (c)

  t (sec)

  (d)

  t (sec)

  FIGURE 10.39 Time evolutions of the DMA emission (recorded at λ

  em = 408 nm) upon steady irradia-

  tion at 260 nm recorded in three experiments labeled as 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The conditions of the three

  experiments are indicated in the legend of graph (a), wherein an overall image of the three kinetics is shown.

  Enlargements of 1 in (b), 2 in (c) and 3 in (d).

  Examples of DMA fluorescence signals that can be recorded upon steady irradiation at

  260 nm are shown in Figure 10.39.

  Graph (a) of Figure 10.39 shows the time evolutions of DMA fluorescence collected at

  408 nm in three distinct experiments, numbered consecutively 1, 2 and 3. Experiments

  1 and 2 are two replicas. In fact, the UV irradiation was carried out only at the bottom

  of 3.5 mL. On the other hand, in case 3, all the 1.2 mL of the solution were under UV.

  In all the three experiments, the luminescence intensity decreased because DMA was

  degraded. If we zoom in on every kinetics (see the other three graphs of the same figure),

  we appreciate their differences. Only in traces 1 and 2, we see luminescence oscillations.

  In 3, they are absent, because there was no convection. The oscillations are just due to the

  convective motions of the solution, and they do not depend on the photo-induced reac-

  tions. In fact, the oscillations recorded in 1 and 2 can also be observed in the light scat-

  tered by the solution, and they disappear under stirring (Laplante et al. 1984). Although

  experiments 1 and 2 were performed in the same conditions, they originated two signifi-

  cantly different results. This behavior is the “butterfly effect” in action. We quantify the

  difference between the two traces by calculating their Fourier spectra (see Figure 10.40).

  The Fourier spectrum of trace 1 consists of just one fundamental frequency that is

  ν0 = 0.0586 s−1 and corresponds to a period of 17 s. The other peaks at 0.1172 s−1 (i.e.,

  2ν0 ) and 0.1758 s−1 (i.e., 3ν0 ) are the second and third harmonics, respectively. The

  Fourier spectrum of trace 2 is more complicated than that of trace 1. It has the largest

  374

  Untangling Complex Systems

  1

  Amplitude

  0.00

  0.05

  0.10

  0.15

  0.20

  0.25

  0.30

  Frequency (Hz)

  2

  Amplitude

  0.00

  0.05

  0.10

  0.15

  0.20

  0.25

  0.30

  Frequency (Hz)

  FIGURE 10.40 Fourier spectra of the fluorescence kinetics 1 (graph on top) and 2 (graph at the bottom)

  shown in Figure 10.39.

  amplitude at the frequency of 0.0078 s−1 that corresponds to a period of 128 s. There

  is also another important frequency of 0.043 s−1 that corresponds to a period of 23 s.

  Based on the kinetic traces and their Fourier spectra, we infer that the Rayleigh numbers

  of experiments 1 and 2 were both included between Ra and Ra , but Ra for 2 was

  c,1

  c,2

  slightly larger than Ra for 1. Therefore, from the definition of Ra (equation [10.48]), it

 

Add Fast Bookmark
Load Fast Bookmark
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Scroll Up
Turn Navi On
Scroll
Turn Navi On
183