Henry sidgwick eye of t.., p.160

Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe, page 160

 

Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe
Select Voice:
Brian (uk)
Emma (uk)  
Amy (uk)
Eric (us)
Ivy (us)
Joey (us)
Salli (us)  
Justin (us)
Jennifer (us)  
Kimberly (us)  
Kendra (us)
Russell (au)
Nicole (au)



Larger Font   Reset Font Size   Smaller Font  

  –; and Piper case, –; and

  understanding, ; S on significance of for

  Myers’s work on the subliminal self,

  religion, –; Green sniffs at, ; S’s as

  –; and S’s experiments with Cowell,

  modelled on Apostles, –; O. Browning

  –; larger epistemological

  and, ; Cowell and, ; S on, and deepest

  significance of, , –; S to Myers

  problems, ; linked to S’s ethics and

  on time wasted in, ; and S, Myers, and

  theology, ; and psychological

  posthumous letter test, –; and

  experiments, ; S and Myers in, –;

  cross-correspondence communications

  and S’s reformism, –; and S’s

  from Myers, Gurney, S, –; Balfour

  reserve, ; ME and, ; and S’s

  on EMS and, ; see also death; deepest

  reconciliation project, –; and S’s

  problems; Society for Psychical

  belief in power of egoism, –; and

  Research

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  psychology: and philosophy, S on, , ;

  desert, –; of male love, Crompton

  S’s support of, ; ME not concerned

  on, –

  with, –, ; ME’s account of moral

  purity, S, ME on, –

  maturation and, –; and S’s

  Pusey, E., –

  reconciliation project, –;

  inconclusiveness of, for S, –;

  queer theory, see Sedgwick, Eve

  contributions of psychical research to, ;

  Gurney’s contributions to, ; and

  race/racism: questions of, –; and

  telepathy, –; Congress of

  Victorian worldview and imperialism, ;

  Experimental supports Census, ;

  and Indian Mutiny, ; as masked by

  significance of Symonds for S’s work in,

  philosophizing, , –; in psychical

  ; and S’s life project, –; and

  research, ; of S and Myers, –; of

  Kant, idealism, –; S and Jamesian,

  S and Mill, ; and S’s epistemology, ;

  –; Symonds on ancient Greeks and,

  of Tennyson, , ; S, EP and, ; and

  –; and Symonds and emergence of

  S, EP on exclusion from franchise, ; S’s

  medical discourse on homosexuality, ;

  politics and questions of, –; S’s

  Ward on S’s account of good and, –;

  comparative reticence about, ; and

  S on Locke and empirical, ; Symonds

  Seeley’s imperialism, –;

  on ignorance of, –; S and Symonds

  Viswanathan on Maine’s, ; in S’s letter

  make innovations in, –; and S’s

  to Lytton, –; in ME’s account of the

  work for women’s higher education, ,

  circle of sympathy, –; and S’s

  –; EP on individualistic, –;

  cosmopolitan ideal, –; and S’s

  and Myers’s work on the subliminal self,

  account of relations with “uncivilized”

  –; S’s work on depth psychological

  peoples, –; in Bryce’s American

  phenomena and, ; see also Greek love;

  Commonwealth, –; Bryce’s work as

  psychical research; Society for Psychical

  key to S’s, –; S to Bryce on, ;

  Research

  and S’s offensive slang, ; and Twain’s

  Ptolemy, 

  Huckleberry Finn, –; and eugenics,

  publicity: Rawls/Kant on, , –;

  –; of Pearson’s work, –;

  Williams on S, ME and, –;

  Harvie on Pearson and, –; S and

  theosophy and, ; psychical research

  Pearson and, –; S, Bryce, Pearson

  and, –; and Oxford Hellenism,

  and, ; Balfour on future of civilization

  Pater, ; and Symonds’s homoerotic

  and, –; T. Roosevelt’s, ; and

  poetry, –, –, –; the

  Anglo-Saxon Confederation, ; S on B.

  Habermasian account of, –; versus

  Kidd on, –; Balfour’s Lamarckian

  Apostolic secrecy, –, ; and S’s

  notion of, ; Bryce’s incoherent notion

  handling of Symonds’s posthumous

  of, ; Dicey to Bryce on, –; S,

  reputation, –; see also Greek love;

  DEP on, –; S’s insufficient

  utilitarianism

  skepticism and, ; and Bryce on South

  public morality, ; Williams on S, ME and,

  Africa, –; and working-class

  –; in S’s utopia, –; S on

  socialist movement, ; of Whitman, ;

  stupidity of, –; Collini on S and

  see also evolution/evolutionism;

  public moralists, –, –; S, EP

  imperialism; politics

  on promotion of, –; and S’s handling

  Railton, Peter, on Moore’s Principia Ethica, 

  of Symonds’s posthumous reputation,

  Raleigh, Walter, Harvie cites on contest of

  –; see also publicity; utilitarianism

  faith and reason, 

  public reason: Rawls/Kant on, ; S on, 

  Rashdall, Hastings: shared orientation with

  public sphere, growth of, ; S fails to

  Moore and Sidgwick, ; on comparison

  theorize completely, –; Habermas

  between S and Moore, –; on S, ME,

  on, –

  and moral schizophrenia, –; S on

  Pufendorf, Samuel, 

  perfectionism of, ; Hurka defends

  Puller, Chomley, with Symonds on reading

  perfectionism of, –; on S, Moore,

  party, 

  and dualism, , ; rejects egoism, ;

  punishment: and issue of free will, S on,

  and meaning of ME, ; S’s critique of,

  –; and S on Kantian notion of

  on dualism, ; S on promise of

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  Index

  

  perfectionist program of, ; anticipates

  of different editions of ME, –,

  criticisms of S, ; on best parts of EP,

  –; S on Socrates as man of,

  ; on S and irrationality, 

  –; and personal identity, Parfit on S

  rationalism: and theology, , ; and

  and, –; Frankena on S and history

  intellectual progress, –; Donagan

  of ethical, –; in post-Christian era,

  on Kant, Whewell and, 

  ; S on limiting dictation of, –;

  Rawls, John (Rawlsianism): on significance of

  Moore on, –; Rashdall on, ;

  S in comparison to Mill and Bentham, ;

  Skorupski on agent-neutral/relative,

  Eye of Universe engages, ; silent on S and

  –; conflicts among agent-neutral,

  issues of sexuality and race, –; takes

  –; Hurka on S, Moore and

  too-narrow view of utilitarianism, ; links

  agent-relative, ; K. Baier on S and

  S to Bentham’s hedonism, ; and

  permissive, –; Crisp defends

  publicity, ; praises ME’s approach,

  dualistic account of, –; Schneewind

  –; and separateness of persons, ;

  on dualism and, –; Phillips on

  and ME and independence thesis, ; and

  dualism and, ; S on Rashdall’s

  interpretation of S’s philosophical

  perfectionism, dictation of, ; S on

  intuitionism, –, , ; rejects

  dualism and limits of, –; Rashdall

  egoism, ; and post-positivist reception

  on S and dualism of, ; S wants results

  of ME, ; misses S’s reconciliaton

  from, –; Gore on S’s belief in, ;

  project, ; and Schneewind’s reading of

  S on, and evolution of ME, –; pain

  ME, –; and Kant on publicity,

  of service to, for S, ; Green on ME on,

  –; misses S’s social epistemology,

  –; S’s professed commitment to,

  –; see also Kant, Immanuel; justice;

  ; and feminist critique of S, ; S’s

  publicity

  anxiety over, summary of, ; PPE on

  Rayleigh, John William Strutt (third Baron),

  myth of consumer sovereignty and,

  ; estate at Terling Place, ; as S’s

  –; and political argument, –,

  brother-in-law, ; and birth of S group,

  –; and political promotion of

  –; connections to S, ; and

  morality, –; S on discussion societies

  collaboration with EMS, –, ;

  and, –; and S’s “Unreasonable

  and honorary degree from Cambridge,

  Action,” ; S on authority and, –;

  

  S’s later epistemological work on, –;

  Rayleigh, Lady (Evelyn Balfour), –;

  S on theism and, –; S on practical

  connections to S group, ; family

  deliberation and, , ; S on work of

  background of, –

  ethical societies and, –; see also

  Rayleigh, Robert John Strutt (fourth Baron),

  epistemology; intuition/intuitionism;

  on S and Boer War, militarism, –

  philosophy

  realism, see empiricism; epistemology;

  received opinion, see commonsense morality;

  intuition/intuitionism

  ethical theory

  reason/reasonableness: dualism of practical,

  reconciliation project: S’s belief in, –,

  ; dualism of, S on M. Arnold on,

  ; varieties of, ; Crisp and, ;

  –; Plato on, ; L. Stephen on S’s,

  Schneewind versus Shaver on S and,

  ; S to Dakyns on limits of, ; and

  –; S’s vision of, –;

  methods of ethics, –; Schneewind

  significance of, for Williams’s reading of

  on role of in ME, ; Hayward on S’s

  ME, –; S’s pessimism about, ,

  Kantian, ; and basic moral notion, ;

  ; and S’s exchanges with Noel,

  and right versus good, –;

  –; and S’s midlife crisis exchanges

  determinateness of, –, –; and

  with Symonds, –; in S’s politics,

  moral schizophrenia in ME, –; and

  –, –; and S’s

  four conditions for self-evidence in ME,

  anti-Machiavellianism in international

  –; S’s ideal of practical in ME, ;

  politics, –; and S’s later writings on

  Crisp on S and, –; S to Symonds on

  epistemology, theism, –, –

  morality and, ; S on plan of ME, debt

  and S’s concession to aesthetics, , ;

  to Butler and, –; and precise

  see also deepest problems of human life;

  statement of dualism, –; Maitland

  dualism of practical reason; reason/

  on S’s commitment to, ; and conclusion

  reasonableness; theism

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  reform/reformism, see academic liberals;

  revolution, fear of, , , , –, ,

  academic reform; utilitarianism

  ; see also politics; socialism

  Reid, Thomas: influence of, on S, , ; S

  Rhodes, Cecil, –

  on Hume and, ; and conclusion of ME,

  Rhodes, Elizabeth: as member of Initial

  –

  Society, –; S agrees with, about

  relations: S on Green’s metaphysics on,

  potential of women, , –

  –; Russell on idealism and internal,

  Ricardo, David, S compares to Jevons on

  –

  value, –

  relativism, S opposes, , ; see also

  Richet, Charles, , ; and the SPR

  epistemology; intuition/intuitionism

  investigation of Palladino, –

  religion: S agrees with Comte on need for, ;

  Richter, Jean-Paul, Symonds compares

  and philosophy, ; S on role of in human

  Dakyns to, 

  life, ; S on views of Maurice and Hutton

  Richter, Melvin: on Green’s faith, ; on

  on, –; and experiments in ethics and

  Green’s background, character, ; on

  intuitive theism, ; S on essence of,

  Jowett’s tutoring of Green, –;

  –; S and Millian, –; S on

  on Green and Church of England, 

  class and, ; Clough on, –; versus

  right/rightness: Chapter  passim, ;

  free inquiry, S, CS on, –; Mill’s

  objective versus subjective, Mill on, ;

  versus Maurice’s, ; and morality,

  and good, S on, ; and maximal good,

  Chadwick on S on, ; Mill on, –;

  Schneewind on, –; S, EP on politics

  S on need for, to overcome dualism,

  and, –, –; and S’s later

  –; S’s reluctance to openly attack,

  epistemology, –; S on theism and,

  –; and science and political

  –; see also basic moral notion; ethical

  prophecy, S on, ; versus science, in

  theory; good/goodness

  founding of SPR, S on, ; and Myers’s

  rights: and orthodox political economy,

  final faith, ; A. Balfour on, ; Myers

  –; natural, S versus Spencer on,

  on, and SPR’s work, –; Myers on

  –

  possible sources of, ; S on impact of

  Ritchie, David G., review of EP, –

  Phantasms and, –; and Jamesian

  Rochdale, 

  psychology, –; of ancient Greece,

  Rohart, Madam, 

  Symonds on, –; Symonds on,

  Romanticism: in Apostles, ; and

 

Add Fast Bookmark
Load Fast Bookmark
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Turn Navi On
Scroll Up
Turn Navi On
Scroll
Turn Navi On
183